Natural Born Citizen – A Place to Ask Questions and Get the Right Answers

July 31, 2010

Some of Stanley Ann (Dunham) Obama Soetoro’s Passport Application Records Are Released due to Strunk FOIA Filing

Some of Stanley Ann (Dunham) Obama Soetoro’s
Passport Application Records Are Released due to Strunk FOIA Filing

Passport file analysis, comments, and more new questions

Posted By: CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)
Posted: 31 Jul 2010 – Last Update: 01 Aug 2010 11 p.m.

Some Stanley Ann Dunham passport file documents are finally released after over a year and a half of Mr. Christopher Earl Strunk requesting and then suing to get the information released in the Strunk vs Dept of State FOIA case. This information should have been been released long ago per his initial FOIA request filed back in Oct 2008. But as with everything with Mr. Obama and his early life, the cover up is maintained as long as possible and then when the files are released things that should be there are missing. It required a federal lawsuit to even get them to release even these documents.

The passport services official says in the cover letter that the some earlier passport application records noted in subsequent filings could not be found. Any possible 1960/1961 passport application paper work information that has been postulated by researchers studying Obama’s early life narrative is missing from this released information. The link to any earlier passport application filed in the early 60s would have been shown in the passport application filed in 1965. But conveniently, the 1965 passport application paper work for a known passport issued on July 19, 1965 is missing. How convenient that key pieces of information about Obama and his family’s early life always turns up missing! This reminds me of the missing page in the Stanley Ann (Dunham) Obama 1964 divorce file.

Why I believe the July 19, 1965 issued passport was issued pursuant to a passport renewal application filed in 1965 for a prior passport that was expiring and that it was not the first passport that Stanley Ann Dunham had. The issue date in July 19, 1965 is four months after her marriage to Lolo Soetoro on March 15, 1965. If she had applied for her first passport in the late spring or early summer of 1965 she would have had to legally apply for it in her married name, Stanley Ann Soetoro. The July 19, 1965 issued passport was not in her married name since she had to AMEND it in 1967 and show her marriage license to get her married name put on her passport at that time. That is what the 1967 document states. And secondly, I believe it was a passport renewal application in 1965, because Obama’s family in Kenya says Stanley Ann (Dunham) Obama was there when Obama was born and government officials in Kenya state Obama was born there. Stanley Ann would have needed a passport in 1961 to get to Kenya and back to the USA. Since the 1965 passport was not in her 2nd marriage name when it was issued 4 months after her marriage to Lolo Soetoro, it is obvious to me she simply renewed her previously issued circa early 1961 original passport which was in either her maiden name or in the name of her first marriage name of Stanley Ann Obama, if issued after Feb 1961 when she is said to have married Barack Hussein Obama Sr.

The copies of documents in what was released per the FOIA request are numbered but not in chronological order. This makes reading the file and the flow of events over time more difficult unless one prints out the file and rearranges the docs in chronological order, which I did.

There is a document numbered P3 which is an application for amendment of her existing passport. This amendment request was apparently done in 1967 (per a handwritten clerk’s name and date note on it since the date is not filled in below Stanley Ann’s signature on the form). This handwritten annotated note and date was apparently done by a clerk seeing a marriage license in order to process the request to amend a passport issued on July 19, 1965. But the copy of that 1965 passport application is not provided in this FOIA request. The passport officials say it could not be found. Why? That 1965 passport was issued several months after she married Lolo Soetoro. She filed the amendment apparently in 1967 allegedly to have it reflect her married name due to her name change after marrying Lolo Soetoro at Molokai Hawaii on March 15, 1965 per page marked P3 of the released documents. Thus the conveniently missing application records for this 1965 passport implies to me that that there was something indicated in it that the powers to be did not want the public to see, i.e., that she had a passport prior to 1965 and the 1965 records indicated it was a Renewal application. So someone made the 1965 application records disappear. The carefully worded cover letter with the FOIA release implies to me that earlier years records have been purged by someone at sometime for some reason since they could not find a record that should be there based on records they did find. Was the 1965 passport issued done per a renewal request for a prior issued passport? As to the implication in the cover letter that early year data may have been cleaned out due to some records retention cut off date. I don’t buy that. Since passport records are filed in files by name and not in boxes or files by year, this does not make sense. I was under the impression that passport records kept and filed by name were kept virtually forever. That wording sounded to me like bureaucratic obfuscation. It sounds to me like HI officials (or whoever controls them) are now instructing the U.S. Passport Office how to obfuscate and parse sentences in cover letters to allow them to not provide what one asks for and yet not be lying. In my opinion, there was probably a passport issued to Stanley Ann (whatever name she used to get it) prior to 1965. The 1965 passport application record pointed to that. So someone made the 1965 application records disappear.

Stanley Ann Dunham Obama Soetoro-Passport Application File-Strunk v Dept of State-FOIA Release-FINAL-7-29-10. This file indicates via the 1967 passport amendment application (document marked P3) that Stanley Ann (Dunham) Obama had a passport for certain issued to her 1965 and she was applying to amend it. Thus she had one for sure in 1965. Since her originally issued passport was good for up to 5 years, that means if the 1965 issued passport was a reissue of a passport to replace the original one that she had, but which was expiring, then she likely got her first passport possibly as early as late 1960 or early 1961.

How does all this fit the narrative to explain the information coming out of Africa and Kenya that Obama was born there? Why would she need a passport at age 18? She would not need it to have a baby in Hawaii or to go to college in Seattle Washington and back and forth to home in Hawaii. What was the real reason this pregnant 18 year old teenager got a passport in late 1960 or early in 1961? I believe it was likely to be able to travel to Kenya to have the baby over there where it was her intent to leave the baby there to be raised by the paternal family in Kenya. She was to then return to re-start her life as a young teenager going to college in Seattle Washington. And then when Stanley Ann did not follow the plan because maternal instincts kicked in and she returned to college in Seattle WITH the new baby, grandma Dunham had to take action and filed the fraudulent action in Hawaii to falsely register the baby as born at home there in Hawaii, with no witnesses, to get her newborn grandson U.S. Citizenship … because it was very easy to do this in Hawaii in 1961. Listen to the Bill Cunningham Radio Show for how it was likely done:

Also in this passport applications file is revealed the exact date of Stanley Ann’s marriage (two different exact dates and locations?) to Lolo Soetoro. But as is typical for everything with this family, nothing is consistent. In the 1967 amendment filing marked P3 she says she married Lolo Soetoro on March 15, 1965 in Molokai Hawaii. But in a later passport renewal application marked P5 filed in 1981 she states she married him on March 5, 1964 in Maui, Hawaii. Which is true? Either way, said marriage dates could have allowed for Obama to have been legally adopted by Lolo Soetoro in Hawaii at age 5 or under, given either of these marriage dates. And in addition, his falsified birth records in Hawaii, fraudulently created by grandma Dunham in 1961, could have been amended to show the new legal name of Barry Soetoro. Obama was mentioned as a son over age 18 in the Soetoro 1980 Divorce file as a dependent of Lolo Soetoro and still receiving financial aid from Lolo Soetoro to attend college. And then later in life as an adult Obama could have amended his vital record in Hawaii again and changed his name back to Barack Hussein Obama II when at that time in his life that name suited him. Obama is a life narrative chameleon. He changes names and citizenship at will during his life to suit his current needs and plans.

Also on document P1 signed in 1968, the second page of that document, she wrote in the block named “Amend to Include (Exclude) Children” the name of her son Barack Hussein Obama and then right below it a weird name or phrase spelled and in parenthesis as (Soebarkah). This entry then has 5 diagonal line strike-through lines across the entry. Another mysterious new tidbit and question as to the meaning of that entry to research.

When the original and complete birth records file for Obama in Hawaii going back to and including Aug 1961, and all subsequent amendments are released, it will likely be very damning to Obama’s self created nativity narrative and other stories of his early life. Children legally adopted at age 5 and under have their new citizenship governed by the international Hague Convention Treaty on adopting children. The United States is a signatory to that treaty. That is another likely reason why Obama alludes to his being age 6 when those Indonesian records are discussed in regards to when his step-father “adopted” him and saying that the adoption occurred in Indonesia. I think that story is more false direction and misinformation type data put out by Obama and his handlers to throw one off the true trail.

See the records that have been released per the Strunk FOIA request and court order at:

Posted by:

CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)
Lead Plaintiff
Kerchner et al v Obama & Congress et al
Please visit this website and help the cause if you can:

P.S. Also released via another FOIA request were the U.S. records of her second husband Lolo Seotoro (parts of this file have been redacted/blacked out). This file contains a very poor quality copy of the March 1965 marriage license of Stanley Ann (Dunham) Obama to Lolo Soetoro, her 2nd husband, and Obama’s step-father in Indonesia.

P.P.S. Close reading of the marriage license of Stanley Ann (Dunham) Obama to Lolo Soetoro in March 1965 reveals that they were married in the state of Hawaii in Molokai in the county of Maui on the 15th of March, 1965.

P.P.P.S. See this link sent to me about passport records retention:

02 Aug 2010: An interesting observation to note about that new name for Barack Hussein Obama found written on the 2nd page of document numbered P1 is that the first three letters of that name Soebarkah, i.e., ‘Soe’ are also the first three letters of Lolo Soetoro’s last name, i.e., ‘Soe’. Lolo Soetore allegedly legally adopted Barack and changed Barack’s name to Barry Soetoro after Lolo married Obama’s mother Stanley Ann (Dunham) Obama on 15 March 1965 in Hawaii. Where and exactly when did the legal adoption and name change occur, in Hawaii under U.S. law or in Indonesian under their laws, no one knows for certain at this point? More questions to answer about the mystery man in the Oval Office.


July 30, 2010

Dr Polland charges in his videos that Identity, Election, Wire, Internet, Interstate Commerce, & Birth Certificate Fraud were committed by Obama et al

Dr. Ron Polland, PhD, charges in the below linked videos that Identity Fraud, Election Fraud, Wire Fraud, Internet Fraud, Interstate Commerce Fraud, & Birth Certificate Fraud were committed by Obama and/or by one or more of the various other organizations and Hawaiian officials that were covering up for Obama during the 2008 election and that the cover up still continues to this day | by Dr. Polland’s “Fraud in the USA” YouTube series

To view the entire series of Dr. Ron Polland’s YouTube “FRAUD IN THE USA” video clips it is suggested you view them in the below sequence. Enter the channel using the #0 link below and then immediately pause the displayed video and open the videos noted in the suggested sequence numbered below :

Great music accompanies each video as you watch and learn about “Fraud in the USA” during the 2008 election of Obama and the continuing cover up.

#0 YouTube channel entry; then select and view the videos in the below suggested sequence, and more of Dr. Polland videos and research results:
#1 “FRAUD IN THE USA (Chapter 1, Part 1)”
#2 “FRAUD IN THE USA (Chapter 1, Part 2)”
#3 “FRAUD IN THE USA (Chapter 1, Part 3)”
#4 “FRAUD IN THE USA (Chapter 1, Part 4)”
$5 “It’s the conspiracy, Stupid!”




Posted by:

CDR Charles Kerchner (Ret)
Pennsylvania USA
And if you can help the cause to Protect Our Liberty, please do so by visiting:

July 22, 2010

The Third Circuit Court of Appeals Finds Attorney Apuzzo Not Liable for Obama’s/Congress’ Damages and Costs Incurred by Them in Defending the Kerchner Appeal

On July 2, 2010, the U.S. Third Circuit Court of Appeals issued its decision affirming the New Jersey Federal District Court’s dismissal of the Kerchner et al v. Obama/Congress et al case for lack of Article III standing. The Court ordered that I show cause in 14 days why the Court should not find me liable for just damages and costs suffered by the defendants, not in having to defend against the merits of plaintiffs’ underlying claims that Putative President Obama is not an Article II “natural born Citizen,” that he has yet to conclusively prove that he was born in Hawaii, that Congress failed to exercise its constitutional duty to properly vet and investigate Obama’s “natural born Citizen” status, and that former Vice President and President of the Senate, Dick Cheney, and current Speaker of the House, Nancy Pelosi, were complicit in that Congressional failure, but rather in having to defendant against what the court considers to be a frivolous appeal of the District Court’s dismissal of their claims on the ground of Article III standing. On Monday, July 19, 2010, I filed my response. This afternoon, on July 22, 2010, the Third Circuit Court of Appeals issued its decision on whether it should impose the damages and costs upon me. The Court has decided not to impose any damages and costs upon me and has discharged its order to show cause. This means that the matter of damages and costs is closed. Here is the Court’s decision:

“ORDER (SLOVITER, BARRY and HARDIMAN, Circuit Judges) On July 2, 2010, this Court filed an Order to Show Cause directing Appellants’ counsel to show cause in writing why he should not be subject to an Order pursuant to F.R.A.P. 38 for pursuing a frivolous appeal. In response, Mario Apuzzo filed a 95-page statement that contains, inter alia, numerous statements directed to the merits of this Court’s opinion, which the Court finds unpersuasive. His request that the Court reconsider its opinion is denied, as the appropriate procedure for that issue is through a Petition for Rehearing. However, based on Mr. Apuzzo’s explanation of his efforts to research the applicable law on standing, we hereby discharge the Order to Show Cause, filed. Sloviter, Authoring Judge. (PDB).”

I want to thank everyone who supported and encouraged me in this battle. This includes everyone who expressed their feelings on this matter through blog posts, articles, comments, and emails.

Mario Apuzzo, Esq.
July 22, 2010

July 20, 2010

The Kerchner et al v. Obama/Congress et al Appeal to 3rd Circuit – Attorney Apuzzo Files his Response to the Show Cause Order

The Kerchner et al v. Obama/Congress et al Appeal to Third Circuit – Attorney Apuzzo Files his Response to the Court’s Order that he Show Cause Why the Court Should Not Impose Defendants’ Damages and Costs Against Him

Posted by:
Charles Kerchner, Commander USNR (Retired)
Lead Plaintiff, Kerchner et al v Obama & Congress et al
July 19, 2010

July 12, 2010

Ad – Kenya My Country, Tussker My Beer – The Elephant in Oval Office Congress & Major Media Won’t Talk About-Wash Times Natl Wkly 19&12 Jul 2010-pg 5

Newest Ad – Kenya My Country, Tussker My Beer – The Elephant in the Oval Office Congress & the Major Media Won’t Talk About – Washington Times National Weekly edition – 19 & 12 July 2010 issues – pg 5

The Newest Ad:

The Evidence:

The Cover-up:

Add your vote here to get Attorney Mario Apuzzo on the air with the Judge Andrew Napolitano to discuss this issue:

Charles Kerchner, Commander USNR (Retired)
Lead Plaintiff, Kerchner v Obama & Congress

Next Page »

Blog at